***UPDATE (July 29, 2009) -- This statement is from the Director of Hawaii's State Department of Health.
***
When last I wrote on the issue of President Obama's long-form birth certificate (CNN: State of Hawaii Destroyed President Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate in 2001!), I said I was done with the story unless there was new information. I certainly did not take long for new information to come out. World Net Daily is reporting that it spoke with Janice Okubo, Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Officer and she stated that Hawaii's vital records (including long-form birth certificates) were not destroyed or discarded when the State went to electronic recordkeeping in 2001. This directly conflicts with the CNN/Media Bistro report.
"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai'i and is a natural-born American citizen," Fukino said in a statement. "I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago."
***
When last I wrote on the issue of President Obama's long-form birth certificate (CNN: State of Hawaii Destroyed President Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate in 2001!), I said I was done with the story unless there was new information. I certainly did not take long for new information to come out. World Net Daily is reporting that it spoke with Janice Okubo, Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Officer and she stated that Hawaii's vital records (including long-form birth certificates) were not destroyed or discarded when the State went to electronic recordkeeping in 2001. This directly conflicts with the CNN/Media Bistro report.
"I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department," Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. "When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don't destroy records."
Okubo affirmed that beginning in 2001, all vital records, including birth records, moved to electronic formats.
"Any records that we had in paper or any other form before 2001 are still in file within the department," she insisted. "We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have."
Therefore, this story is now back alive in my book. Will Obama produce a long-form birth certificate for the world to see?
Source: World Net Daily; Honolulu Advertiser
1 comment:
Here’s Obama’s dilemma in a nutshell (READ VERY CAREFULLY AND DIGEST):
If BHO shows his original long form birth certificate, indeed showing he was born in Hawaii, it will also show his father was American citizen, Frank Marshall Davis, not the Kenyan/British citizen, Barack Obama Sr. While that would allow Barack Jr. to be POTUS eligible as BOTH a “citizen”/“native born citizen” AND an Article 2 “natural born citizen” — that is, born to two American citizens on American soil — it would simultaneously show he is a fraud hiding his real father — an unacceptable political debacle.
If, on the other hand, BHO keeps hiding his original long form birth certificate — while simply repeating, without showing, he was born in Hawaii — he can still CLAIM BOTH he was born in Hawaii AND his father was the Kenyan/British Barack Obama Sr. This would enable Barack Jr. to claim he’s a “citizen”/“native born citizen” but it would mean (if a federal court would ever get around to declaring and thus far no one has standing to bring the suit) that he’s NOT an Article 2 “natural born citizen” and thus not eligible to be POTUS — a legal/constitutional debacle since all acts under an illegal POTUS are void.
So it seems, BHO has elected option one until forced to go option two because for now it looks like no federal court will ever find a plaintiff with standing. (Of course, there’s the additional issue of BHO losing American citizen status if/when he became an Indonesian citizen — that is, IF he returned and was naturalized he would be a legal citizen, but would lose both native and natural born status, and, IF he returned and was not naturalized, he would be an illegal immigrant unlawfully in this country — but we’ll leave that for another day.)
Post a Comment